Exploring the Affordances and Propensities of Multimodality in Narrative Pedagogies through Multimodal Ethnography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62695/AHHO3850Keywords:
Multimodality, Ethnography, Narrative learning, Narrative pedagogies, Critical reflection, Self-reflexivity, Identity exploration, Media Literacy Education (MLE), Christian Religious Education (CRE)Abstract
This paper seeks to reflect on the propensities and advantages of multimodality in teaching and learning, and its rich exploration through multimodal research. It will also report and reflect upon the findings of a small-scale multimodal ethnographic study that was conducted over one scholastic year. This investigated whether, and how, the use of multimodal creative productions can facilitate adolescents’ search for meaning through the re-configuration and re-imagination of life experiences shared in a classroom context. The pedagogical context of this research consisted of RE (Religious Education), and MLE (Media Literacy Education) classrooms, enabling an exploration into a possible fruitful dialogue between these two curricular subjects. Another related aim of this paper is to investigate how a narrative-hermeneutic approach to learning can facilitate meaning-making when applied to and through multimodal production tasks in RE and MLE. The results indicate that through multimodality, made possible by the advancement of creative digital technologies, narrative pedagogies can become more effective. This transpires from the fact that multimodality expands the range of resources available for students to construct and share their narratives, as it integrates the auditory, visual, gestural, linguistic, and spatial modes, augmenting the overall narrative experience. Moreover, this study shows that multimodality can facilitate meaning-making by promoting and nurturing a pedagogy for creative expression, a pedagogy of empathy and compassion, a pedagogy of agency and authenticity, a pedagogy of vulnerability, and a pedagogy through the use of metaphor. The paper also makes specific recommendations on how a narrative-hermeneutical approach through multimodality can promote the specified pedagogies in the context of the mentioned curricular subjects.
References
Atkinson, P., Delemont, S., & Houseley, W. (2008). Contours of Culture: Complex Ethnography and the Ethnography of Complexity. Altamira Press.
Barbot, B., & Heuser, B. (2017). Creativity and Identity Formation in Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Explorations in Creativity Research, The Creative Self (pp. 87–98). Academic Press.
Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
Bezemer, J., & Cope, A. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687537
Borgfeldt, E., & Lyngfelt, A. (2017). Jag ritade först sen skrev jag. Elevperspektiv på multimodal textproduktion i årskurs 3. Forskning om Undervisning och Lärande, 1(5), 64–88.
Brewer, J. D., & Sparkes, A. C. (2011). Young people living with parental bereavement: Insights from an ethnographic study of a UK childhood bereavement service. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 283–290. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.032
Clark, M. C. (2011). Narrative Learning: Its contours and its possibilities. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 126, 3–11.
Diaz, N., Horton, E. G., McIlveen, J., Weiner, M., & Williams, L. B. (2011). Spirituality, religiosity and depressive symptoms among individuals in substance-abuse treatment. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 30, 71–87. DOI:10.1080/15426432.2011.542729
Dicks, B., Soyinka, B., & Coffey, A. (2006). Multimodal ethnography. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058876
Dunn, J., Niens, U., & McMillan, D. (2014). “Cos he’s my favourite character!” A children’s rights approach to the use of popular culture in teaching literacy. Literacy, 48(1), 23–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12024
Dyson, A. (1997). Writing superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture and classroom literacy. Teachers College Press.
Engblom, C. (2016). Prefabricated images in young children’s text-making at school. Designs for Learning, 8(1), 37–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.70
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2015). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
Ferrer-Wreder, L., & Kroger, J. (2020). Identity in Adolescence: The Balance Between Self and Other (4th ed.). Taylor and Francis.
Franzese, P. A. (2017). The Power of Empathy in the Classroom. Seton Hall Law Review, 47(693), Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2956433
Gartland, D., Bond, L., Olsson, C. A., Buzwell, S., & Sawyer, S. M. (2011). Development of a multi-dimensional measure of resilience in adolescents: The adolescent resilience questionnaire. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), Article 134. DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-11-134
Gibbs, R. W. (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press.
Hafner, C. A. (2015). Embedding digital literacies in English Language Teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685. http://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.138
Hagood, M., Moon, J., & Alvermann, D. (2018). Popular culture in the classroom: Teaching and researching critical media literacy. Routledge.
Heath, S. B., & Street, B. (2008). On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. National Conference on Research in Language and Literacy, Teachers College Columbia.
Hiles, D., Moss, D., Thorne, L., Wright, J., & Dallos, R. (2014). “So what am I”— Multiple perspectives on young people’s experience of leaving care. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 1–15. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.007
Jewitt, C. (2009). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. Routledge.
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing Multimodality. Routledge.
Kearns, K. (2014). Frameworks for Learning and Development: Working in Early Childhood Education and Care Series (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning Australia.
King, L. A., & Ilicks, J. A. (2009). Detecting and constructing meaning in life events. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 317–330. DOI: 10.1080/17439760902992316
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lindstrand, F., Insulander, E., & Gilje, Ø. (2018). Multimodal ethnography: Understanding meaning making in practices and across contexts. 9ICOM: Book of Abstracts, 20. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:konstfack:diva-6575
Lotherington, H., & Jenson, J. (2019). Multimodal approaches to digital literacy. In K. Pahl & J. Rowsell (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies (pp. 285–298). Routledge.
Lund, H. (2017). Make It Real and Get Dirty! On the Development of Post-digital Aesthetics in Music Video. Kulle, Daniel/Lund, Cornelia/Schmidt, Oliver/Ziegenhagen, David (eds.): Post-digital Culture, http://www.post-digital-culture.org/hlund-eng
Mansfield, J. (2010). ‘Literacies’ in the Arts: A New Order of Presence. Policy Futures in Education, 8(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.1.99
McAdams, D. P.2001. The psychology of life-stories. Review of General Psychology 5, 100-122.
McLean, K. C., Breen, A. V., & Fournier, M. A. (2010). Constructing the self in early, middle, and late adolescent boys: Narrative identity, individuation, and wellbeing. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 166–187.
McLean, K., Wood, B. and Breen, A. 2013. Reflecting on a difficult life: Narrative construction in vulnerable adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research 28, 431-452. doi:10.1177/0743558413484355.
Michael, S. T., & Snyder, C. R. (2005). Getting unstuck: The roles of hope, finding meaning, and rumination in the adjustment to bereavement among college students. Death Studies, 29, 435–458.
Munford, R. and Sanders, J. 2015. Negotiating and constructing identity: Social work with young people who experience adversity. British Journal of Social Work 45, 1564-1580. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu059.
Noble-Carr, D. and Woodman, E. 2018. Considering Identity and Meaning Constructions for Vulnerable Young People. Journal of Adolescent Research 33 (6), 672-698. DOI: 10.1177/0743558416684952.
Norris, S., & Jones, R. H. (2018). Methodologies for studying online identity. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity (pp. 327–342). Routledge.
Öman, A., & Hashemi Sofkova, S. (2015). Design and redesign of a multimodal classroom: Implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 14, 139–159. https://doi.org/10.28945/2127
O’Neill, T. P. (2010). Mirror Neurons, the New Neuroscience, and the Law: Some Preliminary Observations. Southwestern University Law Review, 39(3), 499–503.
Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). The tell-tale brain: A neuroscientist’s quest for what makes us human. W.W Norton & Co.
Ricoeur, P.1984. Time and Narrative I. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Ricoeur, P. 1992. Oneself as Another. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Rowsell, J. (2011). Rethinking literacy practices and multimodal texts: Indigenous girls writing outside and beyond school. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(1), 38–65.
Schmidt, C., & Wedin, Å. (2015). Barbie, ninjakrigare och popstjärnor: Populärkulturella texter i läs-och skrivundervisningen. In B. Lundgren & U. Damber (Eds.), Critical literacy i svensk klassrumskontext (pp. 51–68). Nordsvenska.
Sutin, A. R., Costa, P. T., Wethington, E., & Eaton, W. (2010). Perceptions of stressful life events as turning points are associated with self-rated health and psychological distress. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 23, 479–492. DOI:10.1080/10615800903552015
Tavernier, R., & Willoughby, T. (2012). Adolescent Turning Points: The Association Between Meaning-Making and Psychological Wellbeing. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1058–1068. DOI: 10.1037/a0026326
van Manen, M. (1997). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy (2nd ed.). Althouse Press.
Varvantakis, C., & Nolas, S. M. (2019). Metaphors we experiment with in multimodal ethnography. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 42(4), 365–378.
Walsh, M. (2017). Multiliteracies, Multimodality, New Literacies and …. What Do These Mean for Literacy Education? International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, 11, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000011002
Williams, W. R. (2014). New technologies, new possibilities for the arts and multimodality in English Language Arts. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 14(4), 327–355.
Yang, D. (2012). Multimodal Composing in Digital Storytelling. Computers and Composition, 29(3), 221–238.
Yonker, J. E., Schnabelrauch, C. A., & DeHaan, L. G. (2012). The relationship between spirituality and religiosity on psychological outcomes in adolescents and emerging adults: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 299–314. DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.08.010
