The Power of Circle Use: Learners’ Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, and Suggestions in Personal, Social and Career Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62695/ZBJG8845Keywords:
Circle Use, Person-Centred, Empowerment, Learner WellbeingAbstract
Circle use is a method of organising and facilitating activities in Personal, Social, and Career Development (PSCD) lessons. PSCD, a compulsory subject in Maltese primary and secondary education, focuses on building emotional literacy, empathy, and social skills. This study adopted an interpretivist perspective and a qualitative methodology to explore learners’ subjective experiences, feelings, and perceptions of circle use in PSCD lessons. Data was collected through four focus groups with semi-structured questions, allowing for rich, context-specific insights about benefits, challenges, and suggestions for circle use in PSCD. Participants, aged 11–16, were selected through purposive sampling. Findings highlight several advantages of circle use, including enhanced communication, better focus, increased participation, and improved relationships. Participants reported that circle use fosters a relaxed, inclusive, and comfortable environment conducive to open communication, reflection, and social-emotional development. Challenges were also identified, including behavioural issues, discomfort for shy learners, vulnerability during sharing, and the absence of desks, which hindered writing activities. Notably, circle use was linked to heightened student wellbeing, empathy development, and empowerment through a safe, non-judgmental atmosphere, supported by educators skilled in managing group dynamics. Suggestions for improvement included incorporating cushioned chairs with retractable tables and creating PSCD groups from existing home classes to ensure familiarity and trust among participants. The study is an inspiration for policy makers in education as it emphasises the need for educator training to address challenges effectively and safeguard the positive aspects of circle use.
References
Ahmad, S., Wasim, S., Irfan, S., Gogoi, S., Srivastava, A., & Farheen, Z. (2019). Qualitative v/s. quantitative research – a summarized review. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 6(43), 2828–2832. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2019/587
Akpan, J. P., & Beard, L. A. (2016). Using constructivist teaching strategies to enhance academic outcomes of students with special needs. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040211
Amedeo, D., Golledge, R. G., & Stimson, R. J. (2009). Person Environment Behavior Research: Investigating activities and experiences in spaces and environments. Guilford.
Ary, D., Cheser Jacobs, L., Sorensen Irvine, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to Research in Education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670
Baldwin, C., & Linnea, A. (2010). The Circle Way: A leader in every chair. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Baumeister, R. F., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Advanced Social Psychology: The state of the science. Oxford University Press.
Benedict, M. E., & Hoag, J. (2004). Seating location in large lectures: Are seating preferences or location related to course performance? The Journal of Economic Education, 35(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.3.215-231
Bezzina, A. (2018). Personal and social development within a European neo-liberal Maltese education system. In M. Attard Tonna & J. Madalińska-Michalak (Eds.). In Teacher education policy and practice – International perspectives and inspirations (pp. 288–314). Foundation for the Development of Education. Retrieved November 2023, from https://1-tonna-madalinska-michalak-teacher-education-policy-and-practice20200505-89592-18o5jmc-libre.pdf
Bezzina, A., & Camilleri, S. (2020). ‘Happy Children’ A project that has the aim of developing emotional literacy and conflict resolution skills. A Maltese case study. Pastoral Care in Education, 39(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2020.1774633
Bezzina, A. (2022). “I feel what you are feeling”: Neural processes for empathy and its impact on academic and holistic achievement. Malta Journal of Education, 3(1), 37-66. https://doi.org/10.62695/dgml4574
Bezzina, A., Falzon, R., & Muscat, M. (2015). Emotional intelligence and the Maltese personal and social development model. In L. Zysberg, & S. Raz (Eds.), Emotional Intelligence (pp. 151–171). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Bickmore, K., & Parker, C. (2014). Constructive conflict talk in classrooms: Divergent approaches to addressing divergent perspectives. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(3), 291–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.901199
Bleiker, J., Morgan-Trimmer, S., Knapp, K., & Hopkins, S. (2019). Navigating the maze: Qualitative research methodologies and their philosophical foundation. Radiography, 25, S4–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.008
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environment on student attitudes and learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.003
Camilleri, S., & Bezzina, A. (2021). Learning in a circle - Apparent simplicity. Pastoral Care in Education, 40(4), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2021.1938645
Camilleri, S., & Bezzina, A. (2022). Adopting the circle pedagogy – relatedness, autonomy and competence. Pastoral Care in Education, 41(4), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2022.2148173
Camilleri, S., Caruana, A., Falzon, R., & Muscat, M. (2012). The promotion of emotional literacy through Personal and Social Development: The Maltese experience. Pastoral Care in Education, 30(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2011.651223
Cefai, C., Ferrario, E., Cavioni, V., Carter, A., & Grech, T. (2014). Circle time for social and emotional learning in primary school. Pastoral Care in Education, 32(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2013.861506
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Depear, M. (2021). Positive classroom environments and rule setting. Academia Letters, Article 3696. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3696
Douglas, D., & Gifford, R. (2010). Evaluation of the physical classroom by students and professors: A lens model approach. Educational Research, 43(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880110081053
Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2009). The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education. Routledge.
Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln’s parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0116
Erwin, J. C. (2004). The Classroom of Choice: Giving students what they need and getting what you want. ASCD.
Evanovich, L. L., Martinez, S., Kern, L., & Haynes, R. D. (2020). Proactive Circles: A practical guide to the implementation of a restorative practice. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2019.1639128
Falout, J. (2014). Circular Seating Arrangements: Approaching the social crux in language classrooms. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.6
Falzon, R., & Muscat, M. (2009). Personal and social development in a small island community: Presenting the Maltese democratic model. In K. Kumpulainen, & A. Toom (Eds.), ETEN 18 (pp. 29–40). University of Helsinki.
Falzon, R., Frendo, C., & Muscat, M. (2019). Paving the way for counselling? The link between Maltese PSD model and counselling. Journal of School-Based Counseling Policy and Evaluation, 1(2), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.25774/7pa6-x214
Fernando, S. Y., & Marikar, F. M. (2017). Constructivist teaching/learning theory and participatory teaching methods. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v6n1p110
Golder, J. (2018). Constructivism: A paradigm for teaching and learning. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3), 678–686. https://ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR1903214.pdf
Heron, J. (1999). The Complete Facilitator’s Handbook. Stylus Publishing.
High, A. J. (2017). Using restorative practices to teach and uphold dignity in an American school district. McGill Journal of Education, 52(2), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.7202/1044479ar
Janis, I. (1972). Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Jankowska, M., & Atlay, M. (2008). Use of creative space in enhancing students’ engagement. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802176162
Khatib, M., Sarem, S. N., & Hamidi, H. (2013). Humanistic education: Concerns, implications and applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.1.45-51
Knapp, M., Hall, J., & Horgan, T. (2013). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Kohn, A. (2015). Progressive Education: Why it’s hard to beat, but also hard to find. Bank Street College.
Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2018). Eight important things to know about the Experiential Learning Cycle. Australian Educational Leader, 40(3), 8–14. Retrieved August 2023, from https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.192540196827567
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kong, Y. (2021). The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771272
Lavery, N. (2016). The Power of Circles: A guide to building peaceful, just, and productive communities - one circle at a time. Resource Publications.
Leach, T., & Lewis, E. (2012). Children’s experiences during circle-time: A call for research-informed debate. Pastoral Care in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2012.702781
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.
Lown, J. (2002). Circle time: The perceptions of teachers and pupils. Educational Psychology in Practice, 18(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360220144539
Marx, A., Fuhrer, U., & Hartig, T. (1999). Effects of classroom seating arrangements on children’s question-asking. Learning Environments Research, 2, 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009901922191
Mosley, J., & Niwano, Z. (2007). An informal report on the use of Jenny Mosley’s whole school quality circle time model in Dublin primary schools. Unpublished.
Muscat, M. (2006). Evaluation of the PSD Programme [Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation]. University of Malta.
Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-based Nursing, 18(2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054
Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Parker-Shandal, C. (2022). Circles: A pedagogical praxis for inclusion and resistance. In Restorative Justice in the Classroom: Liberating Students’ Voices Through Relational Pedagogy (pp. 1–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16590-0_1
Pease, A., & Pease, B. (2004). The Definitive Book of Body Language. Orion Books Ltd.
Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The Interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/12938
Pham, L. T. (2018). Qualitative approach to research. A review of advantages and disadvantages of three paradigms: Positivism, interpretivism and critical inquiry. University of Adelaide. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13995.54569
Pranis, K. (2015). Little Book of Circle Processes: A new/old approach to peacemaking. Simon and Schuster.
Rahman, M. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “Testing and Assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
Rettke, H., Pretto, M., Spichiger, E., Frei, I., & Spirig, R. (2018). Using reflexive thinking to establish rigor in qualitative research. Nursing Research, 67(6), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000307
Riess, H. (2017). The science of empathy. Journal of Patient Experience, 4(2), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373517699267
Rivero, V. (2013). Tim Springer: A new mobile approach to the learning space. Creating a thoughtfully done interactive learning space to enhance student creativity, engagement, collaboration and productivity. Internet@schools, 20(4), 12–15.
Roffey, S. (2006). Circle time for emotional literacy. Sage.
Roffey, S., & McCarthy, F. (2013). Circle Solutions, a philosophy and pedagogy for learning positive relationships: What promotes and inhibits sustainable outcomes? The International Journal of Emotional Education, 5(1), 36–55. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/6148/1/vol5i1p3.pdf
Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A psychotherapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Sawers, K., Wicks, D., & Mvududu, N. (2016). What drives student engagement: Is it learning space, instructor behavior, or teacher philosophy? Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(2), 26–38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309591602_What_Drives_Student_Engagement_Is_it_Learning_Space_Instructor_Behavior_or_Teaching_Philosophy
Schnitzler, T., & Fuchs, T. (2023). Autism as a disorder of affective empathy. Psychopathology, 57(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000533655
Schumann, K., Zaki, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036738
Schunk, D. (2012). Learning Theories: An educational perspective. Pearson Education, Inc. (Original work published 1991).
Sharan, N. N., Toet, A., Mioch, T., Niamut, O., & van Erp, J. B. (2022). The relative importance of social cues in immersive mediated communication. Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V: Proceedings of the 5th International Virtual Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies, IHIET 2021, August 27-29, 2021 and the 6th IHIET: Future Systems (IHIET-FS 2021), October (pp. 491–498). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_62
Speyer, L. G., Brown, R. H., Camus, L., Murray, A. L., & Auyeung, B. (2022). Alexithymia and autistic traits as contributing factors to empathy difficulties in preadolescent children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(2), 823–834. https://doi.org:10.1007/s10803-021-04986-x
Stutzman Amstutz, L., & Mullet, J. (2014). The Little Book of Restorative Discipline for Schools: Teaching responsibility; creating caring climates. Good Books.
Tew, M. (1998). Circle Time: A much‐neglected resource in secondary schools? Pastoral Care in Education, 16(3), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0122.00098
Tews, M., Jackson, K., Ramsay, C., & Michel, J. (2015). Fun in the college classroom: Examining its nature and relationship with student engagement. College Teaching, 63, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2014.972318
Thomson, S. (2011). Qualitative research: Validity. Journal of Administration and Governance, 6(1), 77–82. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stanley-Thomson/publication/266483160_Qualitative_Research_Validity/links/57cdf1ee08aed67896ffc88f/Qualitative-Research-Validity.pdf
Treve, M. (2021). Study of humanistic education: Concerns, implications, and applications. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(11), 6303–6310. https://www.turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/7005/5720
Tulasi, L., & Rao, C. (2021). A review of humanistic approach to student centred instruction. The Review of Contemporary Scientific and Academic Studies, 1(1), 1–5. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Laxmi-Rao-4/publication/359135657_A_Review_of_Humanistic_Approach_to_Student_Centred_Instruction/links/6229ea6897401151d20bd7d2/A-Review-of-Humanistic-Approach-to-Student-Centred-Instruction.pdf
Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Liu, Z., Liang, P., Zadeh, A., & Morency, L. (2019). Words can shift: Dynamically adjusting word representations using nonverbal behaviors. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 7216–7223. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017216
Wannarka, R., & Ruhl, K. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: A review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00375.x
Winters, A. (2014). Using talking circles in the classroom. Heartland Community College. https://www.heartland.edu/documents/idc/talkingcircleclassroom.pdf
Zainuddin, N., & Idrus, R. (2018). Designing learning spaces for effective learning. The Maldives National Journal of Research, 6(1), 7–18. http://saruna.mnu.edu.mv/jspui/handle/123456789/429
Zull, J. (2002). The art of changing the brain: Enriching the practice of teaching by exploring the biology of learning. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Zull, J. (2011). From brain to mind: Using neuroscience to guide change in education. Stylus publishing, LLC.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Janette Scicluna, Amanda Bezzina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
